Communities around the U.S. have seen shootings carried out with weapons converted to fully automatic in recent years, fueled by a staggering increase in small pieces of metal or plastic made with a 3D printer or ordered online. Laws against machine guns date back to the bloody violence of Prohibition-era gangsters. But the proliferation of devices known by nicknames such as Glock switches, auto sears and chips has allowed people to transform legal semi-automatic weapons into even more dangerous guns, helping fuel gun violence, police and federal authorities said.

The (ATF) reported a 570% increase in the number of conversion devices collected by police departments between 2017 and 2021, the most recent data available.

The devices that can convert legal semi-automatic weapons can be made on a 3D printer in about 35 minutes or ordered from overseas online for less than $30. They’re also quick to install.

“It takes two or three seconds to put in some of these devices into a firearm to make that firearm into a machine gun instantly,” Dettelbach said.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    And yet we’re seeing a drop in gun related deaths after it spiked during the pandemic:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/1999-_Gun-related_deaths_USA.png

    It’s too early to call this a trend, but assuming home conversion to full auto is getting common, it has not yet correlated with a rise in gun deaths.

    I don’t think it will for an important reason: full auto actually sucks. Most people don’t know how to use it and tend to spray bullets while hitting nothing. Even the AR15, which has relatively low recoil, is not very accurate when you hold down the trigger like that.

    One exception is the 2017 Las Vegas shooting (which was a bump stock, but effectively the same end result). He was shooting into a large crowd where every bullet was all but guaranteed to hit someone. Most mass shootings aren’t like that.

    The way the military uses full auto isn’t necessarily to hit anyone, either. It’s to force the enemy to keep their heads down so your side can maneuver into a better position. That’s not how a lone mass shooter would operate. They don’t have a team where that tactic makes sense.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If I was told correct info I think even the armed forces dont like full auto outside of specific use cases like mounted guns with hundreds to thousnads of rounds in boxes and for supressing fired from rifles with detachable mags. If you really wanted to mow through a crowd for some ungodly reason a semi auto (not pump) shotgun with buckshot shells and a detachable mag would work as well as full auto rifle in an intermediate cartridge.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The way the military uses full auto isn’t necessarily to hit anyone, either. It’s to force the enemy to keep their heads down so your side can maneuver into a better position

      The military from what I heard doesn’t. They use burst mode to improve the chance of hitting something, but not waste too much too easily.

      • qwrty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It depends

        Not all weapons have a burst mode. Often though, militaries prefer controlled bursts of full auto, but it depends on the role and weapons system. Machine gunners are more likely to go full hog than a rifleman for example, but that’s assuming that all soldiers do the most optimal choice in any given situation, which just isn’t true.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m not sure what your point is. So what if gun deaths are down since the pandemic? Viewing the chart you submitted as evidence we can pretty much just trace a continuation of the trajectory in gun deaths straight to where they would have been from before the pandemic to after - so they’re still trending upward overall. Also, the article doesn’t postulate an increase in gun deaths, just that modded guns are likely being used in crimes.

      Who cares what the military does? These aren’t military users, and they’re using automatic fire to spray bullets in gang turf wars or whatever. They’re not known for taking the time to aim, and are just fine with taking out little kids or bystanders.

      Overall, I have no idea what you’re trying to prove except “Look over there!!” and your points ramble all over the place.

      Fact is that if more bullets fly probability says more people are gonna get hit. Maybe not today, but tomorrow.

      Guns with conversion devices have been used in several mass shootings, including one that left four dead at a Sweet Sixteen party in Alabama last year and another that left six people dead at a bar district in Sacramento, California, in 2022. In Houston, police officer William Jeffrey died in 2021 after being shot with a converted gun while serving a warrant. In cities such as Indianapolis, police have seized them every week.

      So again, not sure what you sound like you’re tying to minimize or dismiss. Full auto isn’t a problem? I can assure you that you’d feel differently if you were downrange in a shopping mall and someone decided to fire one up.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Overall, I have no idea what you’re trying to prove except “Look over there!!” and your points ramble all over the place.

        I’m not the person you’re talking to, but this sentence makes you an imbecile saying that if somebody’s smarter than you, it’s their problem.

        You might consider that if you just discard opinions of people competent in the subject, such as military and, well, usual gun nuts, the end result is not worth much.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The conclusion is that mass shooting deaths would actually go down if we just let people use full auto. It’s a counterintuitive result, but it’s all there.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          /s? Because if not that’s the biggest line of horseshit I’ve ever heard in my life. What do you plan on doing, allowing only Imperial Stormtroopers access to guns? SMH…don’t bother replying.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, there are fewer gun related deaths. But there are more mass shootings and guns have become the # 1 killer of children and teens. Source

      • hatedbad@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        this is false, this stat deliberately counts 18 and 19 year olds as “children” and purposefully includes gang related violence. great example of using statistics to sell a story.

        how many gang members are going to surrender their firearms after a ban?

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Where did you find that? Because the info states … “Of the 6,192 children and teenagers under 18 who were shot in 2023, more than 1,600 died.”

          • hatedbad@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            your source links to this source of data, which only goes up to 2021. The table clearly states they’re counting 15 - 19 year olds.

            that 6,192 number appears to come from the gunviolencearchive site, but I don’t see any source for their data other than claims that “suicide data provided by CDC”

            further, a simple search of the claim “guns number one cause of death in children” will find a lot of valid critiques of this claim.

              • hatedbad@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                10 months ago

                yes I know, I mentioned that in my comment. can you tell me where on that page it indicates their source of data?

                  • hatedbad@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    yes, and where does the Gun Violence Archive get their numbers?

                    looking at their site, the answer is “themselves”… cool. Looking through their listed data it clearly includes gun violence from gang activity.