And my point is that chaplaincy in general is not really relevant to the way they want to do it in Florida. What you’re calling a chaplain is not what they are thinking of as a chaplain. It might sound similar, but they want someone to preach Christianity to children. All of them. That’s the goal there. Sunday school in regular school all day every day.
This is not about France’s idea of school chaplaincy because that’s not in any way what this is or intends to be just because it used the word “chaplain” in the job description.
That’s how Lemmy works. Most of us kind of agree on things. There aren’t many hard core religious or hard core republicans here. So we end up yelling at each other in frustration, establishing the left-leaning as the far right of Lemmy.
That’s not how people who believe in imaginary sky daddies work.
You do understand that this is super religious America and not secular France, right?
Maybe op edited the comment, but they did end it with this:
No, they did, they just continued arguing for it despite that.
Yes, I did, because you know, America is not the whole world. I was speaking about school chaplaincy in general.
And my point is that chaplaincy in general is not really relevant to the way they want to do it in Florida. What you’re calling a chaplain is not what they are thinking of as a chaplain. It might sound similar, but they want someone to preach Christianity to children. All of them. That’s the goal there. Sunday school in regular school all day every day.
This is not about France’s idea of school chaplaincy because that’s not in any way what this is or intends to be just because it used the word “chaplain” in the job description.
I don’t know why we’re debating when I have the impression that we agree and are saying the same thing?
That’s how Lemmy works. Most of us kind of agree on things. There aren’t many hard core religious or hard core republicans here. So we end up yelling at each other in frustration, establishing the left-leaning as the far right of Lemmy.