lemmy.co.nz
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
nekandro@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml · 10 months ago

NATO allies are discussing reclaiming some Chinese-owned infrastructure in Europe

edition.cnn.com

external-link
message-square
21
fedilink
96
external-link

NATO allies are discussing reclaiming some Chinese-owned infrastructure in Europe

edition.cnn.com

nekandro@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml · 10 months ago
message-square
21
fedilink
NATO allies are discussing reclaiming some Chinese-owned infrastructure in Europe | CNN Politics
edition.cnn.com
external-link
NATO officials are discussing taking action to reclaim some Chinese owned infrastructure projects in Europe should a wider conflict with Russia break out in the east of the continent, three officials involved in the discussions told CNN.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    NATO allies are discussing

    Which ones?

    NATO officials are discussing

    Which ones?

    What a lousy article, you can’t know if it’s the proposition talked by the important people or some nutjobs from Baltics like usual in case of such idiocy, or maybe it’s just a journo duck.

    • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      At least a lot of Swedish parties had an anti-China message for the EU election. Those parties are also very anti-infrastructure, so idunno, maybe?

  • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    tfw “rules-based international order” means we’re allowed to break those rules whenever we want but our enemies aren’t allowed to do the same

    • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      They were missing some punctuation when the made that statement it should actually read “rules-based? International order!”

    • anachronist@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      China never would have allowed these transfers to begin with. And if they did happen they would have been reversed with no recourse to the foreign investor. China has actually screwed foreign investors in a million different ways without any real response from the west.

      • Urist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Good, we should take notes.

      • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Can you be specific?

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, they broke the rules the West invented and the West complains about. Now the West is breaking the rules, undermining their entire position that all nations must follow the rules or be punished.

  • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    These dumb fucks are going to kill us all lmao

    • 2484345508@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      Which dumb fuck, nato or China

      • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        NATO, obviously. How is this even a question?

        Why would China start a war when not starting wars has been working out for them for so long?

        • 2484345508@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          They prefer their wars to be cold and funded by Chinese capitalism.

          • carl_marks[use name]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            China doesn’t have a finacial capitalist class that could “lobby” the government to “find new markets” as their banks are nationalized. They also don’t install puppets in foreign governments that shape policy for surplus value extraction or impose capitalism. Please consider reading theory

            • 2484345508@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              10 months ago

              Removed by mod

              • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                10 months ago

                Said guy with twitter bot username.

                • 2484345508@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Removed by mod

              • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Niceee, got’m, fucking owned. Still wrong though.

                • 2484345508@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Removed by mod

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            Wars such as?

            • 2484345508@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              Removed by mod

          • Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Sounds like someone has never read Yan Konma

  • bazingabrain [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The sheer ignorance displayed by these dimwits is truly astounding, as they fail to grasp the profound extent to which their economies are dependent on China in reality. It’s akin to a pampered house cat that believes it reigns supreme within its domain, oblivious to the fact that its sustenance originates from elsewhere entirely.

  • Yeather@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Removed by mod

World News@lemmy.ml

worldnews@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 601 users / day
  • 1.91K users / week
  • 4.93K users / month
  • 13.5K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 35.8K subscribers
  • 12.7K Posts
  • 123K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
  • Jack.@lemmy.ml
  • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org