• go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve provided plenty of evidence, and there is more to be found if you feel like you need it. Do you really expect me to provide an exhausting dissertation on every single detail of the situation? I provided just enough to back up my claims. If you feel you need more, that’s on you and it’s available for you to find. That does not warrant your baseless accusations.

      • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        So, because I copied my messages from before explaining the situation in an attempt to educate people about the toxic behavior of the website owner? Should I have wrote a whole new comment instead? Should I just keep quiet and let toxic people not reap the consequences of their actions?

        Okay, bud.

        • MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Each time burying the lead that the mod abuse was against you.

          I didn’t even know who you were until I realized the username in the screenshot matched.

          Have you ever heard that there’s 3 sides to every story? I’ve seen yours. I think it’s a whole lotta nothing.

          Your inability to let it go after months… It all tells me everything I need to know about why this means so much to you, and why you’re still doing this.

          Educator…okay.

          This keeps you up at night.

          • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Lol your argument is that the mod abuse is somehow okay because it wasn’t against someone else?

            Why should any amount of mod abuse be okay, forgotten, or ‘let go’?

            You’ve spent way too much time arguing a shitty position that really has no effect on you. Then you say I need to ’ let it go’?

            The irony is too sad to be funny. I feel sorry for you.

            • MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              My argument is that you first appear to be a nuetral reporter when, in reality, you are a biased participant.

              Also… This is night 1 of me thinking about this.

              There won’t be a night 2.

              This is night 80 for you.

              Don’t project.

                • MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No. The facts are not facts because they’re opinions. You present your “facts” through the lens of a neutral party, and you are clearly anything but neutral.

                  You make a claim hoping to get the hivemind on your side. You dump screenshots showing your embarrassing behavior and count on the fact that 60+ people won’t even stop to verify or form their own opinion.

                  The sad part is that you’re right. You can say anything and if it aligns with their preconceived narrative, they’ll upvote and keep scrolling.

                  Which is exactly why you bury the lead, because if you said outright from the beginning that it was against you, well then people would be alerted to your inherent bias and actually form their own opinions.

                  • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    The facts are presented as neutral because they exist and are neutral.

                    The moderator deleted messages to hide their negative response, including messages that broke no rules citing a non-existent rule for the reason. They found out that the mod logs are public after they were called out for misusing their moderator powers by deleting messages that broke no rules. Then immediately deleted their account and complained about it on mastodon, very clearly stating that their issue was that mod logs are public.

                    If you think that those facts somehow change because of the context, then that’s on you. You’re just flat wrong.

                    Also it’s “bury the lede” 🙂