- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://feditown.com/post/744772
You must log in or register to comment.
The current security philosophy almost seems to be: “In order to make it secure, make it difficult to use”. This is why I propose to go a step further: “In order to make it secure, just don’t make it”. The safest account is the one that doesn’t exist or that can’t be accessed by anyone, including its owner.
I use a password manager with passkey support and still disabled all my passkeys. The user experience for passkeys is so much worse even when support exists.
How do you login from a device that doesn’t have Bitwarden on it if you have passkeys.
For example a friend’s computer etc
With a password I can type the 20 or so digits of the password. Can’t really be done with a passkey as far as I know
I’d like to hear more about the specifics if the issues you ran into. I keep delaying my options to start using passkeys because it’s a lot to take in at once and the only services implementing them seem to be the most important ones that I really don’t want to experiment with my ability to acess them. I haven’t even been looking at the details of each service’s implementation.
Really? I just used a passkey for the very first time with Google and Bitwarden and it worked quite nicely. What about passkeys is worse for you?
What’s the problem with combination of manager and passkeys?
Using a security key as a
password managerpasskey seems to resolve this issue (I think?), but I guess the issue is more a problem for the casual user who wouldn’t bother with a security key!Can you elaborate on what it means to use a security key as a password manager? I’m not sure if I understand what you mean.
Whoops, I meant “passkey”, I’ll edit my original comment
