• demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Back about 25 years ago Jones was very anti fascist. Wonder what happened to completely ignore the actual fascists. Probably money from the fascists.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The attorneys for Twitter asked to be included on any further information in the case? You’re allowed to just do that? Can I go into a courtroom and demand to be included in any for the communication and all relevant further information in a case? Are they taking Jones on as a client? I’m confused how they have legal standing to do this.

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If I were to guess, and question the existance of standing, my bet is musk was a bidder when infowars was put for sale. My guess is possibly the families themselves objected and asked the court to take a lower bid, that would do what they actually cared about (Create counter messaging to his blowhard conspiracy theories).

      • wagesj45@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        I figured it had to do with the sale of the @realAlexJones twitter handle that was being disputed. I cant remember if that had been settled or not, but I know he was trying to keep it, and the opposing side said it was a business account and should be turned over.