Summary

X, formerly Twitter, faces its largest user exodus, fueled by Elon Musk’s controversial leadership and Donald Trump’s election victory.

Rivals like Bluesky and Threads are gaining traction, with Bluesky surpassing 16 million users.

Musk’s dual role as platform owner and head of Trump’s new Department of Government Efficiency raises ethical concerns, particularly as X becomes a hub for alt-right content and political influence.

Speculation grows over a potential merger with Trump’s Truth Social, but tensions between Musk’s business interests and Trump’s policies could strain their relationship, shaping X’s uncertain future.

  • halfapage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Didn’t it kind of serve it’s purpose for the guy already anyway?

    Can’t he just buy “next cool thing” later?

  • tomatolung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    For some tech nerds, the X-odus is not something to mourn, but could herald the era of decentralised social networks they have been dreaming of known as the “Fediverse”.

    Advocates of the “Fediverse” argue that there should be one account for any social media network in the same way that Gmail accounts can email any email addresses, or mobile numbers call users on any other network.

    In walling off social networks so users can’t leave, the platform has the power. Instead, newer social networks including Bluesky are being built on “ecosystems” that enable them to interconnect.

    No one knows what will happen to X, with predictions ranging from collapse, to flipping to an anti-Trump platform if Musk and the president lock horns, to becoming a training ground for Musk’s xAI venture. AI could gobble up social media, and xAI is valued at $40bn – almost the price Musk paid for Twitter.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Speculation grows over a potential merger with Trump’s Truth Social

    Because if that won’t let the rest of the famous people and media get off of Twitter, nothing will.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Define “end”. It’ll never literally go away because Musk can just keep throwing money down the whole indefinitely. But one metric I’d like to see go to zero is the number of news articles that embed Twitter links as source material.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 hours ago

      My definition of “end”, in the form of analogy: Myspace still exists too, but its relevance is long over.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Everyone I follow suddenly linked to their blue sky accounts now. There’s no reason to be on it anymore

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Maybe Musk can turn X over to Alex Jones, if Jones loses Infowars. X can’t get any worse than it already is, right? Right?

  • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Trump and musk are locked in a voracious 69. Each trying to be the first to orgasm as to satisfy an ego certain it is dominate over the other.