• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A whole 7 days??? Gosh gee willakers!!! You think people can uphold a boycott a whole 7 days???

    Look. Boycotts are effective, but you gotta be stubborn. It’s gotta be “boycott from now on” with no end date.

    Otherwise, it’ll just look like normal fluctuations in their business.

    “Oh, this week was slightly down…ah, but then it stopped. We’re good!”

    But if you boycott forever, then their numbers continuously go down. And if you get other people boycotting, those numbers go down faster.

    THAT’S how you make an impact.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 hours ago

      How do you get people who can’t see themselves boycotting indefinitely? You get them used to it by getting them on board to boycott for a fixed length of time. Ideally, as they warm up to the idea, you get them to boycott for longer.

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        True, but 7 days isn’t enough time for that. I’ve gone weeks between purchasing the kinds of things Amazon delivers, so it’d just be normal. 2+ months is probably better. Especially if those months are Nov & Dec.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Some people can’t even handle a 1-day boycott. I think you’re overestimating the average person’s tolerance for discomfort.

    • marv99@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      In 1995 we boycotted Shell for environmental reasons and it worked: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brent_Spar

      Towing of the platform to its final position began on 11 June. By this time, the call for a boycott of Shell products was being heeded across much of continental northern Europe, damaging Shell’s profitability as well as brand image. […]

      On 20 June, Shell had decided that their position was no longer tenable, and withdrew their plan to sink the Brent Spar […]

      So it needed more than a week of concerted boycott action to bring big business into trouble, but not unlimited boycott.

      • villainy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That boycott had a demand attached, to prevent the sinking of the Brent Spar buoy. Effectively “unlimited” boycott until Shell gave into the demand.

        This and the last no shop Friday thing seem mostly pointless. I mean fuck Amazon for sure but shouldn’t there be some goal? “Boycott Amazon until X, Y, and Z” not “No buy from Amazon for a week but then we’ll be back so no worries!”