The Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education, or FURRIES, Act, filed by Austin-area Republican State Rep. Stan Gerdes, would “prohibit any non-human behavior by a student, including presenting himself or herself, on days other than exempt days, as anything other than a human being.”

The law would allow for exempt days, such as Halloween and other school dress-up days.

The law defines “non-human” behavior as “any type of behavior or accessory displayed by a student in a school district other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species,” with provided examples being:

Using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine or other human byproducts

A personal or outward display, except during a school play or by a school mascot, through surgical or superficial means of features that are non-human such as using tails, leashes, collars or other accessories designed for pets

Using fur, other than naturally occurring human hair or a wig made to look like human hair

Artificial, animal-like ears

Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

Licking oneself or others for the purpose of grooming or maintenance.

  • Radioactive Butthole@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Man they keep coming back to the litterbox thing, it really freaks them tf out. Even though its been debunked dozens of time, my conservative friends all swear they know a guy that knows a guy that swears he saw one for real!

    • Vreyan31@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The litterbox thing is so outrageous that it gives their tyrannical proposals the vineer of addressing a real problem.

      But the litterbox story was fabricated, and the only grain of truth of it is that some classrooms did keep kitty litter as a mitigation against being trapped by an active shooter - another conservative-created problem.

      They will continue to glom onto outrageous stories, to justify their outrageously oppressive proposals.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I was always confused by this active shooter argument. Don’t classrooms have fire doors to the outside isn’t that a requirement that all rooms have at least two exits.

        The school I was in had both fire doors to the outside and bathrooms between the classrooms right up until upper education. Even then they still had fire doors to the outside so everyone could just leave.

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Oh, that’s fine then. School shootings are an American tradition so Republicans won’t prevent that

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The kitty litter is not for pooping in. It is for covering up the blood. (The bucket is for pooping though)

    • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This is no more outlandish or unscientific than the WHOLE anti-trans thing:

      Men pretending to be trans to access woman spaces does not happen any more frequently than furry students shitting in litterboxes.

      The right is consistently and historically mobilized by fantastic beasts their cult leaders brainwash them about.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I would not be able to stop myself from laughing if i saw that happening for real but these people think of it as a threat to their existence, as a crime.

      What a witless world we live in.

      • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        This started out as a far-far-fetched construction to attack trans rights. In fact, whoever designed this hoax is Goebbels-level diabolical. If you break it down, it subconsciously re-arranges the notions of self-identification and toilet use, in a way that presents “reckless liberalism” as an immediate threat to normalcy.

        The people who eat this shit up may be stupid, but the people who design it are not. This goes beyond straw-man attack and slippery slope fallacy. It rather combines both into a powerful manipulation technique that bears resemblance to mass hypnosis. They have someone really malevolent on the propaganda payroll, folks.