psychothumbs@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoThey Criticized Musk on X. Then Their Reach Collapsed.www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1576arrow-down17cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1569arrow-down1external-linkThey Criticized Musk on X. Then Their Reach Collapsed.www.nytimes.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square51fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareLka1988@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 day agoStill a shitty thing to do. As a site admin for millions of people, that person has an ethical and potentially legal obligation to not touch the internal database. If he did it to those users, who else’s comments did he edit?
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoI’m sorry that you completely missed the point of my comment
minus-squareLka1988@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoNo I understood just fine, but that precedent is a far bigger issue than whatever side of the fence you sit on.
Still a shitty thing to do. As a site admin for millions of people, that person has an ethical and potentially legal obligation to not touch the internal database.
If he did it to those users, who else’s comments did he edit?
I’m sorry that you completely missed the point of my comment
No I understood just fine, but that precedent is a far bigger issue than whatever side of the fence you sit on.