Depends - are you white, rich, male, speak English and at least a touch racist yourself?

If not - na, probably not.

Plus his statement changing the law where birth in the US doesn’t grant citizenship.

How long do you think it will be backdated?

Oh God, no!!!

In a knife fight the loser dies in the streets, the winner on the way to hospital.

I’ve thought before that this would be a great way to push back against Trump.

Have every democratic state withhold federal funding (in a separate account, ready to pay) until basic human rights and constitution clauses(???) are upheld.

I can virtually guarantee that most democratic states are financially supporting republican states… and that’s socialism.

Hello oxymoron.

I know this is a shock, we aren’t all American

I think this one is more difficult than it sounds.

You are asking if someone should have the right to make a life long decision, before they have matured enough to make a life long decision. Tie that in with parents who can both have their child’s best interests at heart, or their own preconceived religion and views on it and there is no wide reaching decision that is best for everyone.

Saying that, they would have said no regardless of the discussions and best interests of the individual. These discussions need to be had, but quietly pretty fucking confident they won’t happen in the next 4 years.

So is every tree

To stoop to their level id need a shovel.

The general discussion was to avoid them after Trump supporters went around threatening FEMA.

First rule of first response- look after yourself.

Can biden/ Harris spend the next few months sending over a couple of squadrons of aircraft, spares/ supplies and arms to place Ukraine in a much better position? He cat exactly take them back.

Possibly a 1 month intense training for pilots as well.

Ill take it

Sounds good.

President in prison his entire term.

I usually like those.

Not that one though

Now apply that to the abortion controls fuckhead.

Oh wait, they don’t affect you.

There was also that ban on drink driving, where measures were put in place to stop people doing things that could kill them and just as likely others, but it meant you no longer have the FREEDOM to control what goes into your body and do what you want.

Good regulations exist for a reason - you are welcome to show me your doctorate dissertation that disagrees.

Uni student (among other things).

High school senior are now off on exams, and uni doesn’t start until around end Feb. Semester one is further away than Semester one lasts.

Our education is failing, students aren’t getting involved, and we are finding it harder to focus post covid. So let’s put our students on ln a 4 month holiday during high unemployment rates, rising costs of living and a burning, resource emptying world. Great for mental health.

/rant

Heard a podcast episode from this girls mum. Fuckinf depressing reality.

Uhh… some boob first, then fade to black.

Other poster had a good only example.

Team America world police

Its a very weird line.

Back in ww2 when the allies ran the bombing campaign of German cities the “justification” was that civilians were being used to manufacture arms for the armed forces therefore a part of the military logistics network, and in fairness yes they were - like the British were at the start.

On the other hand it is a deliberate attack on civilians who are not in uniform, not part of the armed forces and not combatants. You could quite easily follow this path to everyone who pays tax or trades with that country as supporting the war effort.

Going at it from a different direction, terrorism is defined as non state actor, using violence against civilians, for a political objective. Therefore terrorism.

Is it justified - probably not but neither is much of warfare. Proportional but didn’t minimize civilian casualties.

Is it terrorism - leaning towards yes.