If those are the choices, it doesn’t matter who “wins”, we all lose.

No, it’s referring to the Streisand Effect.

“Gun people” != “all gun owners”

They didn’t say “all gun owners” they said “gun people” which to anyone with awareness can infer it means the people who tie their identity to their weapons.

What a shitty analogy to women, I’m not even going to touch that.

Would it have been clearer if the original comment said “irresponsible gun people”, sure, but it wasn’t and self-centered people want to be the victim when they haven’t understood they aren’t even in the group.

I’m Dutch and even I could glean the intended meaning from the context.

Just because you have a firearm doesn’t make you part of the “gun people” generalization.

Do you fantasize about getting to shoot your gun? Have you tied your identity to your arsenal of guns? Do you feel the need to open carry at the grocery store? Do you open fire on cars in your driveway?

No? Then you’re not in the “gun people” group being talked about. People who own guns are not the same as the “gun people”, or “gun nuts”/“ammosexuals”.

There are some lovely tools that allow kernel updates sans reboot.

Oh really, I think you and my Debian server with >10 years of uptime should have a conversation.

deleted by creator

I was so disappointed she wasn’t in Aftershocks! But I like how Burt’s character ended up because of it.

Or have the Mexican military give me carte blanche at their inventory.

Burt Gummer in Tremors and Tremors 2.

silicone

It’s silicon. Silicon is a naturally occurring chemical element, whereas silicone is a synthetic substance.

Silicon is for computer chips, silicone is for boobies.

Hmm, all I see is *****************.

TL;DR:

“Stop advocating for things you care about, it’ll never happen. Fuck your passions and your want to share them with people.”

That’s how you sound.

deleted by creator

Just download more.

The point where I was using my master’s in computer engineering to design physical chips? You know, using my fundamental understanding of electricity, magnetism, and the physics that come along with it.

No, you’re arguing the decision to kill a living being against their will is problematic, in which I wholeheartedly agree.

To be able to call the method problematic implies you find killing against will acceptable.

This particular method (inert gas asphyxiation) is absolutely not problematic when killing people that choose to do so: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarco_pod

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Last sentence, second paragraph:

Anyone with a card can bring up to two guests to the club during each visit, the company stipulates.