In late December, Swift’s camp hit Jack Sweeney, a junior studying information technology at the University of Central Florida, with a cease-and-desist letter that blamed his automated tracking of her private jet for tipping off stalkers as to her location. In the letter, attorneys from the law firm Venable accused Sweeney of effectively providing “individuals intent on harming her, or with nefarious or violent intentions, a roadmap to carry out their plans.”

Sweeney provided the link to that letter in an email to the Associated Press. In that message, he emphasized that while he has never intended to cause harm, he also believes strongly in the importance of transparency and public information.

“One should reasonably expect that their jet will be tracked, whether or not I’m the one doing it, as it is public information after all,” he wrote.

A spokesperson for Swift echoed the legal complaint, saying that “the timing of stalkers” suggests a connection to Sweeney’s flight-tracking sites. The spokesperson did not respond to questions seeking elaboration of that charge, such as whether stalkers have been seen waiting for Swift at the airport when her plane arrived or, alternatively, if there is evidence that stalkers have somehow inferred Swift’s subsequent location from the arrival time of her flight.

The legal letter likewise accuses Sweeney of “disregarding the personal safety of others”; “willful and repeated harassment of our client”; and “intentional, offensive, and outrageous conduct and consistent violations of our client’s privacy.”

Such statements are difficult to square with the fact that Sweeney’s automated tracking accounts merely repackage public data provided by the Federal Aviation Administration, a government agency. That fact did not dissuade the Venable attorneys, who demanded that Sweeney “immediately stop providing information about our client’s location to the public.”

  • kernelle@0d.gs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    264
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I thought we went over this already? Public data is public.

    • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      160
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes we did, with elon. He ended up banning the accounts on xitter, after saying he would not do so.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I am also a bit lost as to why Swift would bring this suit. Most of her (work) trips are already public information, since being a public person is part of her job description. It’s a bit like the president complaining that we are tracking Airforce 1 when all news networks already report where he is going.

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think it’s cause you look less relatable to the average poor who’s spending $500 they can’t really afford to go watch you sing.

      • Cogency@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        She could be getting legitimate death threats from Republicans not happy about her politics, which if it’s being published as a form of stochastic terrorism, there has been a legal limit on that as free speech.

  • cmoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Didn’t Elon try something similar and lost in court? In case anyone is interested silicon jets tracks billionaires jets.

    Edit: I confused silicone and silicon.

    • hips_and_nips@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      silicone

      It’s silicon. Silicon is a naturally occurring chemical element, whereas silicone is a synthetic substance.

      Silicon is for computer chips, silicone is for boobies.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      silicone jets

      Minor spelling mistake, but I wouldn’t be surprised to find some in those jets.

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah… I mean at the end he got Twitter and I think he kick him out… that was an expensive way to handle it I guess…

      I mean it probably is still tracked somewhere else and maybe there are other accounts doing it no idea.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean it probably is still tracked somewhere else and maybe there are other accounts doing it no idea

        The comment you replied to provided exactly that link…

        • XTornado@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Oh ok I thought that was somebody else unrelated to that guy.

          Still not sure why all the downvotes I just added info that he was kicked out of Twitter… Ugh .

  • cozy_agent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Interesting how as soon as someone becomes a billionaire they become a dickhead, at least publicly.

    • the_q@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah they were always dickheads… it becomes ok to show it when they hit that billion dollars mark though.

    • Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I live under Iraq and this comment made me look up whether she’s a billionaire. Guess that’s why she’s been in the news so much lately. Jesus. I wish the billionaire count was going down, not up.

    • rab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I believe the opposite, you need to have dickhead qualities to become a billionaire

      • JustUseMint@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This 10000000 percent. You can’t become that without being a horrible person. It entails having copious amounts of money than others could have instead.

    • eek2121@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      77
      ·
      11 months ago

      This doesn’t seem like a dickheaded move to me. First, it was a C&D letter, which has no legal status, and second, the stalker thing is a legitimate concern, especially since the MAGA camp is all riled up about her.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        86
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        But a stalker could just check the same publicly available information right?

        All they’ve done is saved a little bit of effort for the stalker.

        She could just not own a private jet and use a company instead.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeap, this is a lot more to do with people utilizing his data to point out exactly how bad her private jet use is for the environment than it is about personal privacy.

          It’s not like his data is giving any more information than her social media accounts or tour schedule. What exactly is a stalker supposed to do with the information? Are they going to break into the airport and then elude her security detail? Wouldn’t that be a lot harder than just following her after a show?

        • SaltySalamander@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          50
          ·
          11 months ago

          There’s a huge difference between the info being public and it being broadcasted in an easily-readable format with her plane number labelled.

          • Arcane_Trixster@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not for someone to be a stalker. You’re saying the only thing keeping some people from being a stalker is how easy the info is to find, or parse, even.

            • Danksy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              They’re not saying it is the only factor, only that it is a relevant factor. Which it obviously is.

          • meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            info being public and it being broadcasted in an easily-readable format

            What is the bar for difficult or easy to read data? Is a CSV difficult enough? How do you even quantify difficulty of readability to meet that standard? If I build a tool to parse that new data, does that mean every agency would have to change formats and make the data harder to read?

      • dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        But like, shouldn’t she be taking it up with the FAA then? I’m sure you can apply for delay or exemption in extraordinary situations like this one undoubtedly is?

        That is the source of the data after all. If you don’t actually stop the data source from publishing your data, others will continue to use it.

        It’s a dumb approach that makes it look like a hurt ego thing rather than a legitimate concern.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s a lot cheaper to have your lawyers lean on a college student than it is to have them negotiate with the federal government.

          • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            ·
            11 months ago

            FAA LADD and PIA programs are just there. Swift has no excuse outside of her getting called out for CO2.

            This was a non issue when Musk did it. It continues to be a non issue whilst Swift does it. Aircraft enrolled in both programs do not prevent lookup databases from third parties from getting the data eventually, but prevents in most cases real-time tracking unless there’s literal people standing at the airport watching and reporting.

            No, she’s just being petulant about this issue because she’s embarrassed that she’s being told her flying around in a private jet is destroying this planet we’re all living on.

          • Ooops@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The FAA obviously. It’s publically available data, so it’s totally useless to keep one person from publishing the data when anyone can take over and continue.

      • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The data comes from the FAA. It’s public data. All this guy has done is put an interface on it. Unless Swift’s legal team can prove that each individual stalker used an interface hosted by this guy I don’t see how he can be thought of as responsible for anything. And even if they did use an interface hosted by him, he’s still not doing anything other than showing public data. Data that the FAA clearly believe is in a legitimate public interest to make public. If she’s got an issue with that, they’re the people to go after.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      76
      ·
      11 months ago

      Considering the amount of MAGA creeps around, I’d reserve judgement on that. She must get 10 credible death threats a day.

      • the_q@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        She has a 24/7, well paid security team. Most of America is a single $1000 emergency away from homelessness and financial ruin.

        Fuck Taylor Swift and fuck idol worship.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        And now more MAGA creeps know about it, and more trackers will pop up. Streisand Effect.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          11 months ago

          All it takes is one. Everybody can track planes if they want to. This guy just makes it easy. Everybody knows about him since Musk.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            OK is making it easy a threat worth doing something about, or simply making public info easier to find? You’re trying to have it both ways. Is it “just easier” or a real threat?

            Pick one.

      • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sucks to be her then. She could just not fly around in her private jet so much if she’s so worried.

          • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            She’s got enough $$ she doesn’t HAVE to do anything the rest of her life and still live extremely comfortably.

            Her “job” doesn’t force her to do shit.

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              33
              ·
              11 months ago

              You don’t walk in her shoes. You don’t know what is or should be important to her. She may be wealthy, but maybe her personal value is something other than what you think it should be.

              • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                11 months ago

                I don’t walk in her shoes. Yeah duh, if I did I wouldn’t be, because if I ever made 5 million I’d retire, buy a house, and live off interest comfortably the rest of my life. I don’t need any more than that (and technically don’t even need that, considering I don’t have it now and I’m not dead).

                • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  25
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  That’s you, not her. Like most successful people I suspect she has higher aspirations. Although I find her music a bit jingleistic, I suspect making it is important to her, perhaps even more than her bank account.

  • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well here’s a wild idea, why not ride on a normal god damn plane like 90% of every other person who flies. Boom, can’t be traced by some kid then AND its better by a wide range for the environment. Nothing to see here but rich people problems lol

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      11 months ago

      You ever heard of the curse of being famous? Imagine everyone took a love potion and everyone knows your face. Everyone around you is staring at you and attempts to speak to you, touch you, they might even actually worship the ground you walk on. Not only those that love them are around, but those that want to do harm. Cut her hair and sell it, harm her to boast about it. Who knows?

      That’s a fucking hell I’d not want to live. That is why they don’t fly normal. There’s a reason that high profile celebrities don’t fly with the rest. It’s not necessarily a status thing, but a safety thing. There’s a reason the president has secret service and a private jet.

      • felixthecat@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        She’s rich enough to hire a private jet if that’s the problem. I don’t feel sorry for her at all. Or any other billionaire having their jet tracked for that matter.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          My work just sold it’s private jet in favor of hiring private jets to save money even, so it might even be more cost effective

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        11 months ago

        She could ride in an anonymous tour bus, harder to track, she could even have a security convoy, and still save money and emissions. Billionaires are murdering us all, I have no sympathy for her or anyone with her wealth if they take private jets on trips that would take two hours to drive.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          She could even have a private railcar! Easier to track than a tour bus but has a significant cool factor right now.

          I commented on another thread elsewhere that it would be cool if musicians did private railcars and private trains, because just imagine the collaborations and how it would affect both rail infrastructure and musical tours. Plus the opportunities for media and fan interactions become so much cooler than with a cramped tour bus

      • nixcamic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        The president of my very violent country flies economy on public flights. I think she could have a few bodyguards in first class with her and be fine.

      • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        You don’t have to own a plane to charter a private flight. She could just take private planes and not have to deal with crowds of people. Then you wouldn’t be able to track her plane, because she would be taking different planes. This is how most famous people deal with the issue.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      68
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sorry, but this isn’t a reasonable take. Someone like Taylor Swift cannot go into the public without it being a huge security risk. This isn’t a TS thing, this is a “being the most famous person ever right this moment” thing.

      • firadin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Okay but she’s actively choosing to be that famous. She spent 6 years with Joe living a quiet low key life, but she decided to do another breakout into more fame and this is the cost. Plus she could charter jets like other celebrities, or idk just not fly home every weekend from halfway across the world?

      • ReiRose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        She could just rent a different jet each time. Would still pollute, wouldn’t stress out a college kid, would be more difficult for stalkers to track, wouldn’t have drawn as much attention.

      • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        And thousands of MAGA maniacs now thinking she is some villain. I bet she’s getting tons of death threats now. First AI porn, then conspiracy nutjobs on FOX news, then everybody is projecting the worlds failure to act on climate change on her (brilliant piece of fox news propaganda I must say now), and now this. It’s really not her week lol.

  • o_oli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Maybe she should buy twitter and ban the guy, or is this the wrong billionaire I am thinking of?

  • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’s she also going to sue Ticketmaster and her own PR team for publicly releasing every city she’s going to in her tours?

    • Masamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      I hereby sure myself for publishing information about my location in my Instagram posts. Continued posting clearly shows a blatant disregard of my safety and feelings.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeeeeah… I understand her not wanting it to be easier for stalkers to track her, but also private jets are a luxury that’s very bad for the environment, and the information is public anyway. Swift shouldn’t win this one.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Stalkers already can access this information. Also I’m expected to believe they get this information and somehow arrive at her destination before her?

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If she has scheduled a concert in a particular city, they could already be there and just watch the planes.

        But you’d think she has body guards for that.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          So 1) she has already announced where she’s going to be and
          2) flight records are publicly available already.

  • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lol, I love that article. The author clearly also thinks that Taylor and her goons are full of shit on this one. Like, it’s public information provided by the FAA. Will they sue the FAA then?

    • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Both of her planes are blocked at the vendor level, which means they don’t show up on the ASDI feed from the FAA. Her flights are tracked by volunteers at places like flightaware who have their own ADS-B transceivers in their homes

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hey, Ms Swift…? I love some of your music and political opinions. But can you please go fuck yourself? Public = public. You have more privileges than most working people will ever earn in a lifetime, combined. And the climate emergency WE are all experiencing is irreversible…

      • Dragonseel@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That fully depends on your definition of what the “reversed” state is. Will ecosystems adapt to the changed climate? Yes. Can temperatures even drop again? Sure. But species lost are gone forever. Ecosystems destroyed will never be the same again. Different ones can develop with enough time and stopping the human interference… But that is hardly “reversible”. That is… natural systems covering up the damage. Going on. Not reversing it.

        • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Carlin said it best. We’re not worried about saving the planet. We’re worried about saving ourselves. When the time comes, “she’s gonna shake us off like a bad case o’ fleas.”