• HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    No, they didn’t. The point that were made all stated that everything’s protected by free speech. No one here is upset about the Black National Anthem being sung, you’re just trying to stir up shit. Ergo, DON’T MAKE IT A THING.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      No, they didn’t.

      Yes. They did.

      The point that were made all stated that everything’s protected by free speech.

      Yes, I got that. My point (once again) is no one thinks it is illegal, which makes the argument it a strawman (ie: arguing against a point no one is making).

      No one here is upset about the Black National Anthem being sung

      Oh look, another strawman.

      Ergo, DON’T MAKE IT A THING.

      I’m really not sure what this is supposed to mean in this context. I didn’t “make it a thing”. It was “made a thing” by whoever decided to sing it, the people who were upset by it, the article that was published, and the person replying to the article before I even knew it took place.

      • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh look, someone trying to stir up a dumb argument on the internet because they need attention.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, that’s definitely what’s happening. I need attention from anonymous strangers on the internet. 🤦‍♂️ It’s definitely not that someone had a bad take. Deny deny deny.