• SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Absolutely. Active shooter drills are a focus on litigation instead of prevention. Prevention would mean stopping bullying and also providing proper mental health services. The anti bullying campaigns that have been popular over the last couple of decades are little more than for show. Many zero tolerance policies conflict with anti bullying and ends up punishing the one being bullied. Mental health issues are just pushed off onto the parents who often do not have the resources to help or are a major source for the issues in the first place. Combine those with easy access to guns and you have high rates of school shootings. Treating those causes will do a hell of a lot more and have benefits outside of simply avoiding shootings than jusy doing active shooter drills. Active shooter drills treat a symptom that is very unlikely to occur rather than treating the cause which cures a lot of symptoms in the end.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The jailing of parents who provide access to guns is perhaps the only bright spot I see. We’re otherwise failing so hard.

      We can afford to solve these problems. We just decided not to ever since Reagan and probably before.