silence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoChemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1611arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1608arrow-down1external-linkChemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’www.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square62fedilinkfile-text
In practice, this means 3M is continuing to create harm from the risks they spent decades covering up
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28·5 months agoThat’s always their argument. Dumping trash in the ocean? Asbestos? Cigarettes? Chemicals in the ground? DDT? Carbon in the atmosphere? “You obviously don’t understand how much it will cost us to clean up the giant toxic mess we spent so much money trying to hide.”
minus-squareP1nkman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-25 months agoWhich also means line goes down. That is unprecedented, and it’d lower the quality of their lives. Think about the rich people! So, when do we eat them?
That’s always their argument.
Dumping trash in the ocean?
Asbestos?
Cigarettes?
Chemicals in the ground?
DDT?
Carbon in the atmosphere?
Which also means line goes down. That is unprecedented, and it’d lower the quality of their lives. Think about the rich people!
So, when do we eat them?