• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Alternatively, the government must provide the name of the person or people who chose not to halt Alien Enemies Act deportations out of the U.S. despite his order — and Boasberg said he would refer them for prosecution.

    Betting pool is open! Who do we think Drump and Co are going to throw under the bus this time?

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        And the court will keep wagging fingers.

        A serious judge would deputize a citizen militia to arrest him.

        Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

        • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          A serious judge would have ensured a multiple time convicted felon was not permitted to become a dictator in the formerly most powerful country in the world.

            • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              It no longer surprises me that murica is in the state it is in. It did at first, I admit. Perhaps it’s my age. Or my general belief that people are good and care at least some, for their fellow man. Especially their own families, neighbors and friends regardless of their background.

              But that assumption is continually proven wrong lately. People willfully blind themselves to the obvious. They refuse to admit when everything has broken around them. They live in this weird place of denial grasping at things that are no longer effective or even present.

              • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Many of us are well aware that the system has been broken for years and that this was a likely result, but the system also made it very difficult to stop. (The mathematically determined 2 party stem we get with first past the post voting for instance).

                Once democrats blew it by giving up local power, they and the country, were done.

                • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Expecting change without forcing it and ensuring it happens. Sitting back and blaming the politicians. You are the citizens who put them in power and you are the citizens who can remove them from that power. No one else. You. Your countrymen. Your families and friends. You.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Later:

      In an alarming development, the White House slams judges by releasing a new executive order titled “Trump finds probable cause for the Judicial Branch to suck on deeze nuts”; Schumer and Jeffries urge cooperation and reconciliation by wringing their hands and asking you for $13 before midnight to meet a nonexistent deadline. This message brought to you by Brawndo: The Thirst Mutilator!

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      My money is on martial law, and the summary removal or execution of Boasberg.

      Wish I was being sarcastic, but the odds of martial law or war being declared on Hitler’s birthday - the 20th, are far too likely for my taste. It would be within Trump’s character to simply murder his foes, regardless of their place in society.

      • mercano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wait, Hitler was born on weed day? How much better would the world have been if he had gotten into weed instead of coke and amphetamines?

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Now I’m wondering if any of those betting sites have anything going on for these scenarios lmao

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        3 days ago

        That ONLY protects the president, and only from crimes he commits as official acts.

        Now, we all know the mental gymnastics the GOP can do are impressive, but ignoring a court order is not an official act.

        The deportation itself? That’s the act that he’s immune from.

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          ·
          3 days ago

          The bigger deal is that this immunity protection does not extend to the President’s minions and officials.

          Trump is never going to round up the prisoners and fly the plane to El Salvador all by himself. He’s got people to do that, and those people can be served with court orders and criminal contempt process.

          • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            The bigger deal is that this immunity protection does not extend to the President’s minions and officials.

            Not directly, but any employee or agent has no liability if they are following legal orders of their employer. So no - they cannot be prosecuted either.

            • perestroika@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              State employees aren’t specifically beholden to the agency who hires and fires them.

              The state has an executive, legislative and judicial branch.

              If they follow an executive order but contravene a law, or contravene a court order that they know about (since only the courts make final interpretations of law) - my understanding is that they have no immunity.

        • aramova@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s meant to deter the “only following orders” Nazi defense.

          In theory there should be checks and balances which prevent anything absurdly fascist, it’s expected that it would be halted before it happens, but I suspect those who wrote this into the Constitution didn’t count on the level of fascism we’re seeing now.

          We’ll see how it works out.

                  • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    The legislative branch isn’t the courts.

                    The legislative branch has been confirming all of the appointments.

                    The legislative branch could try impeaching him (again) but we both know that’s not going to happen. Best case scenario is yet another vote down party lines. The magats are complicit. The corporatists are complicit. There are scant few voices that speak up for anything that doesn’t benefit themselves.

                    The majority are letting all of this happen.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          That’s not entirely accurate. His immunity for “official acts of the office of the President” is to be determined by the presiding judge. An “official act” has yet to be defined, and there is nothing written about charges. He can and should be charged as well, so we can begin to define the limits of his immunity. Refusing to challenge it in fear that it will be overturned, is exactly what he’s hoping for.

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No one. He will just start dealing out pardons like it’s a poker game. The US Justice System is dead.